<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paws4Laws - The Official Legislative Blog of the American Rottweiler Club &#187; Criminalizes Dog Ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paws4laws.com/tag/criminalizes-dog-ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paws4laws.com</link>
	<description>learn How To Protect Your Dog AND Your Rights!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson TN Seeks To Impose Anti-Pet Ordinance &amp; Criminalize Dog Ownership</title>
		<link>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/jackson-tn-seeks-to-impose-anti-pet-ordinance-criminalize-dog-ownership/</link>
		<comments>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/jackson-tn-seeks-to-impose-anti-pet-ordinance-criminalize-dog-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Pet Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory-Spay-Neuter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment Violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminalizes Dog Ownership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jackson, Tennessee city council is considering an anti-pet ordinance that criminalizes pet ownership, violates the constitutional rights of local dog-owning citizens, and will increase the number of pets euthanized.

The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to anti-pet legislation as ineffective and even dangerous in the prevention of dog bites and the protection of animals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jackson, Tennessee city council is considering an anti-pet ordinance that criminalizes pet ownership, violates the constitutional rights of local dog-owning citizens, and will increase the number of pets euthanized.</p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to anti-pet legislation as ineffective and even dangerous in the prevention of dog bites and the protection of animals.</p>
<p>AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE<br />
CITY OF JACKSON, TENNESSEE</p>
<p>SECTION 1. Be it ordained by that the Council of the City of Jackson, Tennessee amend the text<br />
of the official Animal Control Ordinance, Title 10, Chapter 1 by adding Sections 10-105 through<br />
10.111 to the existing Animal Control ordinance as indicated by the underlined sections below:</p>
<p>TITLE 10<br />
ANIMAL CONTROL<br />
CHAPTER</p>
<p>1. IN GENERAL.<br />
2. LIVESTOCK AND OTHER FARM ANIMALS.<br />
3. VICIOUS DOGS.<br />
CHAPTER 1<br />
IN GENERAL<br />
SECTION<br />
10-101. Definitions.<br />
10-102. Running at large prohibited.<br />
10-103. Noise prohibited.<br />
10-104. Cruelty to animals.</p>
<p>10-101. Definitions. Whenever in this title the following terms are used, they shall have<br />
the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section.</p>
<p>(1) &#8220;Animals and fowls&#8221; as specifically named by whatever name they might be<br />
called, and includes every age and sex of each of the herein named species of animals and fowls.<br />
(2) &#8220;Approval&#8221; means approval by the health officer pursuant to power granted to<br />
him in this chapter.<br />
(3) &#8220;Health officer&#8221; is the director of health and sanitation of the city.<br />
(4) &#8220;Keeper&#8221; refers to any person owning, keeping, having, using or maintaining any<br />
of the animals or fowls herein referred to.<br />
(5) &#8220;Rodent-proof&#8221; is a state or condition not conducive to entry, feeding or<br />
harboring of rodents.<br />
(6) &#8220;Sanitary&#8221; means a condition of good order and cleanliness which precludes the<br />
probability of disease transmission. (1972 Code, § 6-1)<br />
10-102. Running at large prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person raising,<br />
owning and/or keeping any dog or other animal to willfully suffer or permit any such creature to<br />
run at large upon the public streets, avenues, alleys, parks or other public property of the city, or<br />
to willfully suffer or permit any dog or other animal to run at large or to go upon the premises<br />
owned or in possession of or under the control of any other person in the city. (1972 Code, § 6-<br />
38)<br />
10-103. Noise prohibited. No person shall willfully or knowingly keep or harbor on his<br />
premises any dog or other animal that makes or creates loud and obnoxious noises by whatever<br />
method created, thereby disturbing the peace of the neighborhood or disturbing the occupant of<br />
adjacent premises or people living in the vicinity of such loud and obnoxious noise.<br />
A person shall be deemed to have willfully and knowingly violated the terms of this<br />
section if such person shall have been notified by any police officer of such disturbance and shall<br />
have refused for a period of twenty-four (24) hours to correct such disturbance and prevent its<br />
recurrence. (1972 Code, § 6-39)<br />
10-104. Cruelty to animals. It shall be unlawful for any person to cruelly maltreat any<br />
dumb animal in the city; or to willfully and wantonly kill, maim, wound, poison or disfigure any<br />
horse, ass, mule, cattle, sheep, goat, swine, dog or other domesticated animal, bird or beast of any<br />
kind; or to mutilate, cruelly kill, over-drive, over-ride or over-load, or unnecessarily confine, or in<br />
any manner oppress the same; or to unnecessarily fail to provide the same with proper food, drink<br />
or shelter; or to drive, work or use the same when such animal is maimed, wounded, sick, lame or<br />
otherwise unfit for labor; or to willfully abandon the same to die; or to carry or to cause the same<br />
to be carried, hauled or forced along in a cruel or inhumane manner; or to leave any animal tied<br />
up or confined anywhere, day or night, for more than six (6) hours at a time without properly<br />
feeding, watering and caring for the same. This section shall not be construed to prevent<br />
policemen or other persons from destroying dogs or other animals when lawfully entitled to do<br />
so. (1972 Code, § 6-7)<br />
10-105. Number of animals.<br />
(a) No more than a combined total of 6 adult dogs or adult cats are allowed per<br />
residence.<br />
(b) References to dogs and cats only refer to dogs and cats older than six (6) months.<br />
There are no restrictions on the number of dogs and cats younger than six (6) months old that can<br />
be on the premises.<br />
(c) If it is determined that a person is in violation of this section, such person shall be<br />
allowed thirty (30) days from the notice of violation to cure same.<br />
(d) Any person who wishes to exceed the maximum combined number of six (6) dogs or<br />
cats must apply to the City Revenue Office for a special &#8220;Animal Lodging&#8221; permit.<br />
10-106. Animal Lodging Permits.<br />
(1) No person shall have over a combined total of six (6) adult dogs or cats per residence<br />
without first obtaining an operational permit (hereinafter, &#8220;permit&#8221;) issued by the City of Jackson<br />
Revenue Office.<br />
(2) A permit shall be issued only after the City of Jackson Animal Control Office<br />
completes an inspection and determines that the minimum requirements and standards, as set<br />
forth herein have been met. After approval, a permit shall be issued upon payment of the<br />
applicable fee. The permit shall be prominently displayed on the premises where animals are<br />
located. The cost of a permit and other related fees should be $50.00.3) The permit is valid for a<br />
period of one (1) year from the date of issue, unless otherwise stated or revoked. The permit shall<br />
be renewed annually. Said permit is not transferable, assignable or refundable. Renewal<br />
applications for permits shall be made within thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.<br />
(4) A new establishment shall use its initial permit issue date as the anniversary date for<br />
the purposes of permit expiration and renewal.<br />
(5) Each separate property shall be required to have a permit.<br />
(6) It shall be a condition of the issuance of any permit that the City of Jackson Animal<br />
Control Office shall be allowed, at any reasonable time, to inspect without notice, all domestic<br />
animals and all premises where animals are kept.<br />
(7) Failure to apply for a permit shall constitute a violation.<br />
Deleted: (<br />
(8) References to dogs and cats only refer to dogs and cats older than six (6) months.<br />
There are no restrictions on the number of dogs and cats younger than six (6) months old that can<br />
be on the premises.<br />
(9) If it is determined that a person is in violation of this section, such person shall be<br />
allowed thirty (30) days from the notice of violation to cure same.<br />
(10) Rescue organizations are exempt from this section.<br />
10-107. Restraint &amp; Confinement to Property. Dogs or cats shall not be chained, tied,<br />
fastened to dog houses, trees, fences, or other stationary objects as a means of confinement to<br />
property. Dogs may be restrained by means of a fence, pen or a trolley system, which is a tether<br />
attached to a pulley on a cable run, if the following conditions are met:<br />
(1) Only one dog may be tethered to each cable run.<br />
(2) The tether must be attached to a properly fitting collar or harness worn by the dog,<br />
with enough room between the collar and the dog&#8217;s throat through which two fingers may fit.<br />
Choke collars and pinch collars are prohibited for purposes of tethering a dog to a cable run.<br />
(3) There must be a swivel on at least one end of the tether to minimize tangling of the<br />
tether.<br />
(4) The tether and cable run must be of adequate size and strength to effectively restrain<br />
the dog. The size and weight of the tether must not be excessive, as determined by the Animal<br />
Control officer, considering the age, size and health of the dog.<br />
(5) The cable run must be at least (20) feet in length and mounted at least four (4) feet<br />
and no more than seven (7) feet above ground level.<br />
(6) The length of the tether from the cable run to the dog&#8217;s collar should allow access to<br />
the maximum available exercise area and should allow continuous access to water and shelter.<br />
The trolley system must be of appropriate configuration to confine the dog to the owner&#8217;s<br />
property, to prevent the tether from extending over and object or an edge that could result in<br />
injury or strangulation of the dog, and to prevent the tether from becoming tangled with other<br />
objects or animals.<br />
(7) When a dog is confined outside by means of an enclosure or an electronic<br />
containment device, the area must be of size for adequate movement of the dog and cleaning.<br />
(8) No person shall transport any animal in an open truck without adequate physical<br />
restraint, which will prevent the animal from exiting the vehicle or hanging itself.<br />
10-108. Enforcement.<br />
(1) The provisions of this section shall be enforceable by any law enforcement, animal<br />
control, or code enforcement officer within their jurisdiction.<br />
(2) This section is enforceable by all means provided by law. The maximum fine is $50<br />
per day per violation. Additionally, the City may choose to enforce this section by seeking<br />
injunctive relief in the Environmental Court. In addition to the enforcement procedures provided<br />
herein, this section may be enforced by any other means provided by law, by actions at law and in<br />
equity, and if the City prevails in such action, the City shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable<br />
attorney&#8217;s fees incurred in such action.<br />
10-109. Unaltered Animals. Anyone with an unaltered cat or dog over the age of 6<br />
months, if unaltered for any other reason than medical purposes, is required to pay an annual fee<br />
for a breeding license in the amount of $200.00 per owner. The fee will be collected by the City<br />
of Jackson Revenue Office. It is the legislative intent that the provision of this section shall not<br />
apply to the training or use of hunting dogs for sport nor shall it apply to the training and use of<br />
dogs for law enforcement purposes, nor shall it apply to the use of dogs in competitive shows or<br />
dogs that service those with disabilities.<br />
10-110. Removal of animals. The city Animal Control Officer or any humane officer or<br />
police officer may initiate before a city judge a search warrant for any premises upon a showing<br />
of probable cause to believe that a violation of any provision of this section is occurring or has<br />
occurred within a reasonable time thereon; and take charge of and impound the animals or fowl<br />
involved in such violations. The matter of disposition of any such animal shall be determined by<br />
a city judge.<br />
10-111. Use of Fees Collected. One half of the funds collected from these fees will be<br />
deposited in the General Fund of the City of Jackson. One-half of the funds will be<br />
utilized for a low cost spay and neuter program, for which the City will contract with a<br />
local animal rescue group that is designated by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501 (c)<br />
(3) non-profit organization . The contracting non-profit agency will be required to<br />
provide an annual report to the City accounting for use of the funds. One quarter of the<br />
funds will be used by the Health and Sanitation Department to fund a certified humane<br />
officer&#8217;s expenses to investigate animal abuse cases.<br />
Submitted by City Councilman Frank Neudecker<br />
TITLE 10<br />
ANIMAL CONTROL<br />
CHAPTER<br />
1. IN GENERAL.<br />
2. LIVESTOCK AND OTHER FARM ANIMALS.<br />
3. VICIOUS DOGS.<br />
CHAPTER 1<br />
IN GENERAL<br />
SECTION<br />
10-101. Definitions.<br />
10-102. Running at large prohibited.<br />
10-103. Noise prohibited.<br />
10-104. Cruelty to animals.<br />
10-105. Number of animals.<br />
10-106. Restraint &amp; Confinement to Property.<br />
10-107. Breeders License<br />
10-108. Enforcement.<br />
10.109. Removal of Animals.<br />
10.110. Use of Fees Collected<br />
10-101. Definitions. Whenever in this title the following terms are used, they shall have<br />
the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section.<br />
1) &#8220;Animals and fowls&#8221; as specifically named by whatever name they might be<br />
called, and includes every age and sex of each of the herein named species of<br />
animals and fowls.<br />
2) &#8220;Approval&#8221; means approval by the health officer pursuant to power granted to<br />
him in this chapter.<br />
3) &#8220;Health officer&#8221; is the director of health and sanitation of the city.<br />
4) &#8220;Keeper&#8221; refers to any person owning, keeping, having, using or maintaining any<br />
of the animals or fowls herein referred to.<br />
5) &#8220;Rodent-proof&#8221; is a state or condition not conducive to entry, feeding or harboring<br />
of rodents.<br />
6) &#8220;Sanitary&#8221; means a condition of good order and cleanliness, which precludes the<br />
probability of disease transmission. (1972 Code, § 6-1)<br />
7) “Fence&#8221; is a barrier enclosing or bordering an area usually made of posts and<br />
wire, wood, or approved metal or vinyl or Fence: A structure of wire, wood,<br />
stone, brick or other materials, excluding invisible fencing, which is of sufficient<br />
height and strength to act as a barrier against the passage of the animal it is<br />
intended to enclose.<br />
 <img src='http://paws4laws.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> “Humane Treatment” means a domesticated dog or cat has received required<br />
vaccinations. The animal has adequate food, water, shelter, and has the ability to<br />
move freely within a confined area.<br />
9) “Adequate space” means a sufficient safe space for adequate exercise suitable to<br />
the age, size, species and breed of animal. For dogs, adequate space means an<br />
enclosure with a minimum of 150 square feet per adult dog.<br />
10) “Breeding”<br />
10-102. Running at large prohibited. (a) The owner of a dog commits an offense if that<br />
dog goes uncontrolled by the owner upon the premises of another without the consent of<br />
the owner of the premises or other person authorized to give consent, or goes<br />
uncontrolled by the owner upon a highway, public road, street or any other place open to<br />
the public generally.<br />
1) It is an exception to the application of this section that:<br />
a. The dog was being moved from one place to another by the owner of the dog;<br />
b. The dog is a police or military dog, the injury occurred during the course of<br />
the dog&#8217;s official duties and the person injured was a party to, a participant in<br />
or suspected of being a party to or participant in the act or conduct that<br />
prompted the police or military to utilize the services of the dog;<br />
c. The violation occurred while the injured person was on the private property of<br />
the dog&#8217;s owner with the intent to engage in unlawful activity while on the<br />
property;<br />
d. The violation occurred while the dog was protecting the dog&#8217;s owner or other<br />
innocent party from attack by the injured person or an animal owned by the<br />
injured person;<br />
e. The violation occurred while the dog was securely confined in a kennel, crate<br />
or other enclosure; or<br />
f. The violation occurred as a result of the injured person disturbing, harassing,<br />
assaulting or otherwise provoking the dog.<br />
10-103. Noise prohibited. No person shall willfully or knowingly keep or harbor on his<br />
premises any dog or other animal that makes or creates loud and obnoxious noises by<br />
whatever method created, thereby disturbing the peace of the neighborhood or disturbing<br />
the occupant of adjacent premises or people living in the vicinity of such loud and<br />
obnoxious noise.<br />
A person shall be deemed to have willfully and knowingly violated the terms of this<br />
section if such person shall have been notified by any police officer of such disturbance<br />
and shall have refused for a period of twenty-four (24) hours to correct such disturbance<br />
and prevent its recurrence. (1972 Code, § 6-39)<br />
10-104. Cruelty to animals. It shall be unlawful for any person to cruelly maltreat any<br />
animal in the city; or to willfully and wantonly kill, maim, wound, poison or disfigure<br />
any horse, ass, mule, cattle, sheep, goat, swine, dog or other domesticated animal, bird or<br />
beast of any kind; or to mutilate, cruelly kill, over-drive, over-ride or over-load, or<br />
unnecessarily confine, or in any manner oppress the same; or to unnecessarily fail to<br />
provide the same with proper food, drink or shelter; or to drive, work or use the same<br />
when such animal is maimed, wounded, sick, lame or otherwise unfit for labor; or to<br />
willfully abandon the same to die; or to carry or to cause the same to be carried, hauled or<br />
forced along in a cruel or inhumane manner; or to leave any animal tied up or confined<br />
anywhere, day or night, for more than six (6) hours at a time without properly feeding,<br />
watering and caring for the same. This section shall not be construed to prevent<br />
policemen or other persons from destroying dogs or other animals when lawfully entitled<br />
to do so. (1972 Code, § 6-7)<br />
10-105. Number of animals.<br />
In no event shall any person keep at his or her premises more pet animals than can be<br />
properly maintained in a healthy condition without presenting a health or safety hazard to<br />
the owners, keeper or others and without constituting a nuisance to the occupants or<br />
neighboring properties.<br />
10-106. Restraint &amp; Confinement to Property.<br />
It shall be unlawful for any owner or possessor of any dog to fail to keep the dog under<br />
restraint or control as provided for in this section.<br />
A dog is considered not under restraint or control when it is running at large, whether<br />
wearing a collar and tag or not. Reasonable care and precautions shall be taken to prevent<br />
the dog from leaving the real property limits of its owner, possessor, or custodian, and<br />
ensure that:<br />
It is securely and humanely enclosed within a house, building, fence, pen of<br />
adequate size or other enclosure of adequate size out of which it cannot climb,<br />
dig, jump, or otherwise escape on its own volition; and that such enclosure is<br />
securely locked at any time the animal is left unattended<br />
Fences for all dogs must be of sufficient height, strength, and repair to safely<br />
contain the dogs on the premises and prevent children from entering the yard or<br />
enclosure.<br />
It is on a leash and under the control of a competent person; or it is off leash and<br />
obedient to and under voice command of a competent person who is in the<br />
immediate proximity of the dog any time it is not restrained as provided for<br />
above.<br />
Dogs or cats shall not be chained, tied, fastened to dog houses, trees, fences, or<br />
other stationary objects as a means of confinement to property.<br />
10-107. Breeder License &#8211; Any person who possesses or maintains less than twenty<br />
adult female dogs in whole or in part for the purpose of the sale of their<br />
offspring as companion animals will require a yearly license issued by the city<br />
of Jackson. Fee should be established by City Council vote and periodically<br />
reviewed. License approval will require a background check before license can<br />
be granted as well as an inspection of the grounds. Background checks will be<br />
performed by __________________. Property inspections shall be performed<br />
by _________________________. Note: Should grounds will be inspected<br />
randomly or annually by city health officials as a prerequisite to obtaining a<br />
license.<br />
10-108. Enforcement<br />
1. The provisions of this section shall be enforceable by any law enforcement,<br />
animal control, or code enforcement officer within their jurisdiction.<br />
2. This section is enforceable by all means provided by law. The maximum fine is<br />
$50 per day per violation. Additionally, the City may choose to enforce this<br />
section by seeking injunctive relief in the Environmental Court. In addition to the<br />
enforcement procedures provided herein, this section may be enforced by any<br />
other means provided by law, by actions at law and in equity, and if the City<br />
prevails in such action, the City shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable<br />
attorney&#8217;s fees incurred in such action.<br />
10-109. Removal of animals. The city Animal Control Officer or police officer may<br />
initiate before a city judge a search warrant for any premises upon a showing of<br />
probable cause to believe that a violation of any provision of this section is<br />
occurring or has occurred within a reasonable time thereon; and take charge of<br />
and impound the animals or fowl involved in such violations. Animal shall be<br />
placed in the care of the Animal Control and their facilities.<br />
Note: Friday US District Judge Charles Simpson III ruled on the following<br />
1. Section 91.022 of the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Gov. Code of<br />
ordinances (LJCMGC) is declared unconstitutional insofar as it requires owners<br />
of unaltered dogs to obtain written approval of their enclosures. Plaintiffs&#8217;<br />
motion for summary judgment (DN 20) is GRANTED in this respect, and<br />
Metro&#8217;s motion for summary judgment (DN27) is DENIED to the same extent.<br />
Metro is hereby enjoined from enforcing 91.022&#8242;s written approval requirement.<br />
2. Section 91.101 of the LJCMGC of Ordinances is declared unconstitutional<br />
insofar as it threatens to deprive pet owners of their property rights without a<br />
finding of guilt. Plaintiffs&#8217; motion for summary judgement (DN 20) is<br />
GRANTED in this respect, and Metro&#8217;s motion for summary judgement(DN 27)<br />
is DENIED to the same extent. Metro is hereby enjoined from enforcing 91.101<br />
in the manner just described.<br />
3. Plaintiffs&#8217; Fourth Amendment claims regarding 91.073(D), 91.094(A)<br />
and 91.101.(A) are hereby DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.<br />
The Court is without authority to rule on the parties&#8217; motions for summary<br />
judgment as regards those claims.<br />
10-110. Use of Fees Collected. All of the funds will be utilized for a low cost spay and<br />
neuter program, for which the City will contract with a local veterinary clinic.<br />
The contracting clinic will be required to provide an annual report to the City<br />
accounting for use of the funds.<br />
Add to<br />
Vicious Dogs<br />
Owners of dogs that have been determined as vicious by means of (Vicious Dog Board)<br />
who maintain their dogs out-of-doors shall fence a portion of their property with a second<br />
perimeter or area fence. Within this perimeter or area fence, the vicious animal must be<br />
humanely confined inside a pen or kennel of adequate size. The pen or kennel may not<br />
share common fencing with the area or perimeter fence. The kennel or pen must have<br />
secure sides and a secure top attached to all sides. The sides must either be buried two<br />
feet into the ground or sunken into a concrete pad. The gate to the kennel shall be inwardopening<br />
and shall be kept locked except when tending to the animal&#8217;s needs such as<br />
cleaning the kennel or providing food and water.<br />
Proposal Dr. Lake Proposal Councilman<br />
Neudecker<br />
Definitions &#8211; “Fence&#8221; is a barrier enclosing<br />
or bordering an area usually<br />
made of posts and wire, wood,<br />
or approved metal or vinyl or -<br />
- “Fence” is a structure of wire,<br />
wood, stone, brick or other<br />
materials, excluding invisible<br />
fencing, which is of sufficient<br />
height and strength to act as a<br />
barrier against the passage of<br />
the animal it is intended to<br />
enclose.<br />
- “Adequate space” means a<br />
sufficient safe space for<br />
adequate exercise suitable to<br />
the age, size, species and breed<br />
of animal. For dogs, adequate<br />
space means an enclosure with<br />
a minimum of 150 square feet<br />
per adult dog.<br />
- “Breeding”<br />
Number of animals &#8211; No more than a combined<br />
total of 6 adult dogs or adult<br />
cats are allowed per<br />
residence.<br />
- No restrictions on the<br />
number of dogs and cats<br />
younger than six (6) months<br />
old<br />
- Thirty days from the<br />
notice of violation to<br />
resolve<br />
- May exceed the maximum<br />
via a special &#8220;Animal<br />
Lodging&#8221; permit.<br />
- Prerequisite to permit -<br />
City of Jackson Animal<br />
Control Office completes an<br />
inspection<br />
- Permit is recommended at<br />
$50.00<br />
- The permit is valid for a<br />
period of one (1) year from<br />
the date of issue<br />
- In no event shall any person<br />
keep at his or her premises<br />
more pet animals than can be<br />
properly maintained in a<br />
healthy condition without<br />
presenting a health or safety<br />
hazard to the owners, keeper or<br />
others and without constituting<br />
a nuisance to the occupants or<br />
neighboring properties.<br />
Restraint &amp;<br />
Confinement to Property<br />
- Dogs or cats shall not be<br />
chained, tied, fastened to<br />
dog houses, trees, fences, or<br />
other stationary objects as a<br />
means of confinement to<br />
property. Dogs may be<br />
restrained by means of a<br />
fence, pen or a trolley<br />
- Dogs or cats shall not be<br />
chained, tied, fastened to dog<br />
houses, trees, fences, or other<br />
stationary objects as a means of<br />
confinement to property.<br />
- Enclosed within a house,<br />
building, fence, pen of<br />
adequate size or other<br />
system, which a tether is<br />
attached to a pulley on a<br />
cable run….<br />
- When a dog is confined<br />
outside by means of an<br />
enclosure or an electronic<br />
containment device, the area<br />
must be of size for adequate<br />
movement of the dog and<br />
cleaning.<br />
- No person shall transport<br />
any animal in an open truck<br />
without adequate physical<br />
restraint.<br />
enclosure of adequate size out<br />
of which it cannot climb, dig,<br />
jump, or otherwise escape on<br />
its own volition; and that such<br />
enclosure is securely locked at<br />
any time the animal is left<br />
unattended<br />
- Fences for all dogs must be of<br />
sufficient height, strength, and<br />
repair to safely contain the<br />
dogs on the premises and<br />
prevent children from entering<br />
the yard or enclosure.<br />
- It is on a leash and under the<br />
control of a competent person;<br />
or it is off leash and obedient to<br />
and under voice command of a<br />
competent person who is in the<br />
immediate proximity of the dog<br />
any time it is not restrained as<br />
provided for above.<br />
- Invisible fences are not<br />
considered secure encloses<br />
Enforcement<br />
Enforceable by any law<br />
enforcement, animal<br />
control, or code<br />
enforcement officer<br />
This section is enforceable<br />
by all means provided by<br />
law. The maximum fine is<br />
$50 per day per violation.<br />
City may choose to enforce<br />
in the Environmental Court.<br />
The City shall be entitled to<br />
its costs and reasonable<br />
attorney&#8217;s fees incurred.<br />
Same<br />
Recommend a change in<br />
maximum fine to refer to state<br />
law that limits fines<br />
Unaltered Animals Anyone with an unaltered<br />
cat or dog over the age of 6<br />
months is required to pay an<br />
annual fee for a breeding<br />
license in the amount of<br />
$200.00 per owner.<br />
Not included<br />
Exceptions: if unaltered for<br />
any other reason than<br />
medical purposes.<br />
The training or use of<br />
hunting dogs for sport<br />
The training and use of dogs<br />
for law enforcement<br />
purposes<br />
The use of dogs in<br />
competitive shows<br />
Dogs that service those with<br />
disabilities.<br />
Removal of animals By:<br />
- Animal Control Officer<br />
- any humane officer<br />
- police officer<br />
- May initiate before a city<br />
judge a search warrant for<br />
any premises upon a<br />
showing of probable cause<br />
to believe that a violation<br />
- Take charge of and<br />
impound the animals or<br />
fowl involved in such<br />
violations.<br />
- The matter of disposition<br />
of any such animal shall be<br />
determined by a city judge<br />
By:<br />
Animal Control Officer<br />
Police officer<br />
May initiate before a city judge<br />
a search warrant for any<br />
premises upon a showing of<br />
probable cause to believe that a<br />
violation Evidence of such<br />
violations must be presented to<br />
the court of jurisdiction and<br />
upon a guilty verdict take<br />
charge of and impound the<br />
animals or fowl involved in<br />
such violations. Animal shall<br />
be placed in the care of the<br />
Animal Control and their<br />
facilities.<br />
Breeding License Anyone with an unaltered<br />
cat or dog over the age of 6<br />
months, if unaltered for any<br />
other reason than medical<br />
purposes, is required to pay<br />
an annual fee for a breeding<br />
license in the amount of<br />
$200.00 per owner<br />
Any person who possesses or<br />
maintains less than twenty<br />
adult female dogs for the<br />
purpose of the sale<br />
Require a yearly license issued<br />
by the city of Jackson.<br />
Fee should be established by<br />
City Council vote and<br />
periodically reviewed.<br />
Approval will require a<br />
background check before<br />
license can be granted as well<br />
as an inspection of the grounds.<br />
Background checks will be<br />
performed by<br />
__________________.<br />
Property inspections shall be<br />
performed by<br />
_________________________.<br />
Use of Fees Collected One half of the funds<br />
collected from these fees<br />
will be deposited in the<br />
General Fund<br />
One-half of the funds will<br />
be utilized for a low cost<br />
spay and neuter program<br />
The City will contract with<br />
a local animal rescue group<br />
use of the funds.<br />
One quarter of the funds<br />
will be used by the Health<br />
and Sanitation Department<br />
to fund a certified humane<br />
officer&#8217;s expenses.<br />
All of the funds and fines will<br />
be utilized for a low cost spay<br />
and neuter program<br />
The City will contract with a<br />
local veterinary clinic for the<br />
use of funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/jackson-tn-seeks-to-impose-anti-pet-ordinance-criminalize-dog-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mashpee, MA Residents Urge Discriminatory Anti-Pet Law &amp; Pitbull Ban</title>
		<link>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/mashpee-ma/</link>
		<comments>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/mashpee-ma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Pet Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breed-Specific Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminalizes Dog Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warrantless Search & Seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Town of Mashpee, MA  is urging the City Council adopt an anti-pet law, including a  ban on pit bulls.    The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to breed-specific legislation as ineffective and even dangerous in the prevention of dog bites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Town of Mashpee, MA  is urging the City Council adopt an anti-pet law, including a  ban on pit bulls.    The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to breed-specific legislation as ineffective and even dangerous in the prevention of dog bites.</p>
<p>The breed-specific anti-pet ordinance was driven by residents upset by the fact that new neighbors who own &#8220;pitbulls&#8221; moved into the area. The dogs have not bitten anyone, however, neighbors are not happy and petitioned the town to pass a ban.  Mashpee residents will vote on the ordinance on October, 19th at a live townhall meeting.  A copy of the proposed ordinance is below:</p>
<p><strong>Article 17</strong></p>
<p><strong>Proposed Pit Bull Regulation</strong></p>
<p><strong>Town of Mashpee</strong></p>
<p><strong>Section 1. Purpose</strong></p>
<p>Dogs known as “pit bulls” have generally-exhibited traits such as (i) powerful instincts for<br />
dominance which naturally result in a proclivity for fighting; (ii) a strong prey drive, which<br />
inspires a natural chase instinct that often results in their aggressive pursuit of cats, rabbits, other<br />
dogs, and human children; (iii) a stubbornness that results in sustained, unyielding<br />
aggressiveness once an attack begins; (iv) powerful jaws capable of crushing bones and hanging<br />
on to victims even while the animal withstands infliction of injury or pain; and (v) a combination<br />
of stamina, agility, strength, and “gameness” (the will to successfully complete a task). Judicial<br />
and legislative bodies have reacted by noting that the classification of pit bulls as dangerous<br />
animals has a rational basis in fact and that adopting controlling measures in order to reduce the<br />
likelihood of human injury bears a rational relationship to the governmental objectives of<br />
preserving public health, public safety, and public welfare. The Town of Mashpee believes it is<br />
necessary to regulate, subject to certain exceptions with certain restrictions, pit bulls in order to<br />
fulfill its primary mandate to protect human health, safety, and welfare within the Town.</p>
<p><strong>Section 2. Definitions</strong></p>
<p>PIT BULL – Any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrie, American Staffordshire Terrie,<br />
Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog of mixed breed displaying the majority of the physical<br />
traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing<br />
characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel<br />
Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds, such characteristics being identifiable<br />
as an element of its breeding by a licensed veterinarian, by the animal control officer, or by any<br />
other qualified person, or any dog registered or licensed as a pit bull. Specifically excepted from<br />
this definition is any dog with proof by American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club papers or<br />
by a written certification or written notice from a veterinarian licensed in the Commonwealth of<br />
Massachusetts that the dog does not contain in its lineage any American Pit Bull terrier,<br />
American Staffordshire Terrier, or Staffordshire Bull Terrier. As per an animal DNA lineage test</p>
<p><strong>TOWN – The Town of Mashpee</strong></p>
<p><strong>OWNER –</strong> Any person who owns, possesses, keeps, exercises control over, maintains, harbors,<br />
transports, or sells a pit bull:</p>
<p><strong>KEEPER</strong> – Any person who possesses, keeps, exercise control<br />
over, maintains, harbors, transports, or sells a pit bull whether or not that person is an owner;</p>
<p><strong>HOUSEHOLD</strong> – All persons residing in one dwelling unit in the Town of Mashpee whether<br />
such persons are related by blood or by marriage or are unrelated.</p>
<p><strong>ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER</strong> – The Animal Control Officer of the Town of Mashpee</p>
<p><strong>MUZZLE </strong>– A restraining appliance made of metal, plastic, leather, cloth or a combination of<br />
these materials that, when fitted and fastened over a pit bull’s snout/mouth/head, prevents the pit<br />
bull from biting but allows room for the pit bull to breather/pant;</p>
<p><strong>SECURE TEMPORARY ENCLOSURE </strong>– A secure enclosure used for purposes of transporting<br />
a pit bull and which includes a top and bottom permanently attached to the sides except for a<br />
securable door used for the ingress and egress of a pit bull. Such enclosure must be of such<br />
material, and such door closed and secured in such a manner, that the pit bull cannot exit the<br />
enclosure without human assistance.</p>
<p><strong>HEARING OFFICER </strong>– The Town of Mashpee Board of Selectmen or the Town board or Town<br />
official designated by the Town Board of Selectmen to conduct hearings required by this by-law.</p>
<p><strong>Section 3. Pit Bulls Prohibited</strong></p>
<p>It shall be unlawful for any person to own, possess, keep, exercise control over, maintain, house,<br />
harbor, transport, or sell within the Town any pit bull, subject only to the exceptions set forth in<br />
sub-paragraphs (b)-(g), below.</p>
<p>The owner or keeper of a pit bull that is registered and licensed with the Town Clerk as of the<br />
date of enactment of this by-law may apply for a pit bull license in accordance with the<br />
requirements of section 4, below, such license to be the subject of annual renewal. Any owner or<br />
keeper who has applied for and received a pit bull license in accordance with this sub-paragraph<br />
and who maintains the pit bull at all times in compliance with the pit bull license requirements of<br />
section 4, below, and all other applicable requirements of this Section…may keep a pit bull<br />
within the Town.</p>
<p>Any person who is not covered by sub-paragraph (b), above, shall be entitled to apply for one<br />
annual pit bull license in accordance with the requirements of section 4, below. Notwithstanding<br />
the foregoing, no household in the Town shall be occupied at any one time by more than one<br />
owner or keeper of a pit bull licensed under this sub-paragraph (c) and in accordance with this<br />
Section</p>
<p>The Town Kennel may temporarily harbor and transport any pit bull for purposes of enforcing<br />
the provisions of this Section</p>
<p>Any humane society operating an animal shelter which is registered and licensed by the Town<br />
may temporarily hold any pit bull that it has received or otherwise recovered, but only for so<br />
long as it takes to contact the Town Kennel and either turn the pit bull over to the Town Kennel<br />
employees or to receive permission to destroy or to have destroyed the pit bull pursuant to the<br />
provisions of sections 5 and 6, below, if applicable.</p>
<p>A person may temporarily transport into and hold in the Town a pit bull for the sole purpose of<br />
showing such pit bull in a place of public exhibition, contest, or show sponsored by a dog club<br />
association or similar organization, provided that the sponsor have received written permission<br />
from the Town’s Board of Selectmen, have obtained all other permits or licenses required by bylaw,<br />
and furnishes protective measures adequate to prevent pit bulls from escaping or injuring<br />
members of the public. The person who transports and holds a pit bull for showing shall at all<br />
times while the pit bull is being transported within the Town keep the pit bull confined in a<br />
secure temporary enclosure.</p>
<p>Failure by the owner to keeper to comply or remain in compliance with all of the terms of an<br />
applicable exception set forth above shall subject the pit bull to immediate impoundment and/or<br />
disposal pursuant to section 5 and 6, below, and shall operate to prevent the owner or keeper<br />
from asserting such exception as a defense in any proceeding under sections 5, 6 and 7, below.</p>
<p><strong>Section 4. Pit Bull License Requirements</strong></p>
<p>The owner or keeper of any pit bull who is allowed to apply for an annual pit bull license under<br />
section 3(b) or section 3(c) above, shall at the time of application for the annual pit bull license<br />
comply with or otherwise provide sufficient evidence that the owner or keeper is in compliance<br />
with all of the following regulations:</p>
<p>The owner or keeper of the pit bull shall keep current the license for such pit bull through annual<br />
renewal. Such license is not transferable and shall be renewable only by the holder of the<br />
license. A pit bull license tag must be obtained by the owner or keeper at the time of issuance of<br />
the license. Such license tag shall be attached to the pit bull by means of a collar or harness and<br />
shall not be attached to any pit bull other than the pit bull for which the license was issued. If the<br />
pit bull tag is lost or destroyed, a duplicate tag may be issued upon the payment of a twenty<br />
dollar ($20) fee;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(a) The owner or keeper must be at last 21 years of age;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(b) The license application form to be completed by the owner or keeper and presented to the<br />
Town Clerk shall require (i) the complete legal name of the pit bull’s owner and/or<br />
keeper and presentation of a positive form of government-issued picture identification<br />
(no photocopies) for the owner and/or keeper, and the Animal Control Officer shall make<br />
a copy of such identification and attach it to the application; (ii) the complete residential<br />
address of the pit bull’s owner and/or keeper; (iii) the complete address where the pit bull<br />
will be primarily housed/sheltered; (iv) the telephone number of the pit bull’s owner or<br />
keeper; (v) the complete details of the pit bull’s physical identification, including but not<br />
limited to breed, sex, weight, color, markings, and any other distinguishing physical<br />
characteristics, all provided by the owner and/or keeper; (vi) a photograph of the pit bull<br />
that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days old; and (vii) the complete details of the pit<br />
bull’s documented identification, including but not limited to the pit bull’s registration<br />
and/or license number as issued by the Town and true and accurate copies of the pit bull’s<br />
rabies vaccination and a copy of the pit bull’s health record as prepared by a veterinarian<br />
which shall not be dated more than thirty (30) calendar days from the application for<br />
registration of the pit bull under this sub-section;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(c) The owner or keeper shall present to the Town Clerk proof that the owner or keeper has<br />
procured liability insurance in the amount of a 1 million/2 million policy, covering any<br />
damage or injury which may be caused by a pit bull during the twelve-month period<br />
covered by the pit bull license. The policy shall contain a provision requiring the<br />
insurance company to provide written notice to the Town Clerk not less than fifteen (15)<br />
days prior to any termination of the policy and not less than five (5) days subsequent to<br />
cancellation or expiration of the policy;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(d) The owner or keeper, at the owner’s or keeper’s own expense, shall have had the pit bull<br />
spayed or neutered and shall present to the Town Clerk in connection with the license<br />
application documentary proof from a licensed veterinarian that this sterilization has been<br />
performed. This requirement shall be waived upon a written statement from a licensed<br />
veterinarian that the procedure should not or cannot be performed for reasons of the<br />
health or age of the animal.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(e) Upon the owner’s or keeper’s successful application, the Animal Control Officer shall<br />
provide to the successful owner or keeper registering a pit bull (i) a pit bull license tag;<br />
(ii) a complete copy of the application for registration and license as submitted by the<br />
owner or keeper; (iii) a written summary of all methods for contacting the Animal<br />
Control Officer, including but not limited to the Animal Control Officer’s telephone<br />
number during business hours, the Animal Control Officer’s telephone number during<br />
non-business hours, the telephone number of the Town Police Department, and the 24-<br />
hour helpline or hotline for the Town; and (iv) a legible copy of this Section<br />
(f) The license tag issued by the Animal Control Officer pursuant to this section shall be<br />
attached to the pit bull by means of a collar or harness and shall not be attached to any pit<br />
bull other than the pit bull for which the license tag was issued. If the pit bull license tag<br />
is lost or destroyed, a duplicate may be issued by the Animal Control Officer upon the<br />
owner or keeper’s application and payment of a fee in the amount of twenty-five dollars<br />
($25.00);</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(g) The Animal Control Officer and the Town Clerk shall each maintain a file containing the<br />
license numbers, pit bull tag numbers, and the names and addresses of the owner or<br />
keepers. The owner or keeper shall notify the Animal Control Officer and the Town<br />
Clerk in writing of any change of address;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(h) At all times when a pit bull is at the property of the owner or keeper, the owner or keeper<br />
shall keep the pit bull confined, either in a secure temporary enclosure or within the<br />
premises of the owner or keeper or within a fenced enclosure from which the dog cannot<br />
escape. At all times when a pit bull is away from the property of the owner or keeper, the<br />
owner or keeper shall keep the pit bull either securely leashed and muzzled or in a secure<br />
temporary enclosure;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(k) The owner or keeper shall not sell or otherwise transfer the pit bull to any person resident<br />
in the Town except a member of the owner’s or keeper’s immediate family who will then<br />
become the owner or keeper and will be subject to all of the provisions of this section<br />
The owner or keeper shall notify the Town Clerk within five days in the event that the pit<br />
bull is lost, stolen, dies, or has a litter. In the event of a litter, the owner or keeper (i)<br />
must deliver the puppies to the Town Kennel for destruction or (ii) shall permanently<br />
remove the puppies from the Town and provide sufficient evidence of such removal by<br />
the time the puppies are weaned. In no event shall the owner or keeper be allowed to<br />
keep in the Town a pit bull puppy born after the date of enactment of this Section that is<br />
more than eight weeks old. Any pit bull puppies kept contrary to the provisions of this<br />
subsection are subject to immediate impoundment and disposal pursuant to this Section</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(l) The owner or keeper shall have posted at each possible entrance to the owner’s or<br />
keeper’s property where the pit bull is kept a conspicuous and clearly legible sign. Such<br />
sign must be at least eight and one-half (8 ½) inches by eleven (11) inches in rectangular<br />
dimensions and shall contain only the words “WARNING – PIT BULL DOG” in<br />
lettering which is not less than two inches in height and which is in sharp contract with<br />
the background of the sign.</p>
<p><strong>Section 5. Impoundment</strong></p>
<p>(a) Any pit bull found by the Animal Control Officer or any member of the Town Police<br />
Department to be on the loose, at-large, or unconfined, or which has been observed by the<br />
Animal Control Officer or any member of the Police Department to have mauled, bitten,<br />
attacked, threatened, or in any way menaced another animal or human shall be presumed<br />
to be in violation of this by-law and shall be subject to immediate impoundment;</p>
<p>(b) The Animal Control Officer is authorized to immediately impound any Pit Bull which is<br />
in violation of this by-law and which does not fall within the exceptions listed therein.<br />
The Animal Control Officer is authorized to house and/or dispose of any impounded Pit<br />
Bull at his/her sole professional discretion.</p>
<p><strong>Section 6. Impoundment Procedure and Enforcement</strong></p>
<p>(a) The Animal Control Officer is empowered to make whatever inquiry or investigation is<br />
deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this by-law. The Animal<br />
Control Officer is empowered to seize and impound any pit bull found to be in violation<br />
of this by-law or any pit bull for which the owner or keeper has failed to comply with the<br />
provisions of this Section</p>
<p>(b) The Animal Control Officer shall not release a pit bull from impoundment unless the<br />
owner or keeper (i) provides proof of registration and license satisfactory to the Animal<br />
Control Officer, (ii) provides adequate proof that any violations of this by-law have been<br />
corrected in a manner satisfactory to the Animal Control Officer, (iii) remits payment to<br />
the Animal Control Officer of all fines issued pursuant to violations under this by-law;<br />
and (iv) remits payment to the Animal Control Officer for the costs associated with the<br />
impounding of the pit bull and the term of impoundment of the pit bull;</p>
<p>(c) The Animal Control Officer and the Town Police Department shall each have the<br />
authority and shall cooperate with each other to the greatest extent possible to enforce the<br />
provisions of this by-law. The Town Police Department shall notify the Animal Control<br />
Officer of any location or address at which a pit bull is observed;</p>
<p>(d) A pit bull found in violation of this by-law shall be subject to immediate impoundment;</p>
<p>(e) Any violation of this Section shall be subject to a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for<br />
the first offense, and a fine of one hundred dollars ($100) for each additional offense. In<br />
addition, upon any violation of this Section the owner’s or keeper’s pit bull shall be<br />
subject to impoundment. Each day a violation exists shall be considered a separate and<br />
distinct violation.</p>
<p><strong>Section 7. Appeal Procedure</strong></p>
<p>(a) The owner or keeper of a dog that has been impounded pursuant to this by-law or that has<br />
been the subject of a citation for a violation under this by-law may dispute the<br />
classification of such a dog as a pit bull or whether the provisions of this by-law for<br />
enforcement have been complied with by filing a written petition with the Animal<br />
Control Officer for a hearing concerning such classification no later than seven (7)<br />
calendar days after the date of impoundment or citation. A petition shall include, but not<br />
be limited to, (i) the complete legal name and social security number of the pit bull’s<br />
owner and/or keeper; (ii) the complete residential address of the pit bull’s owner and/or<br />
keeper; (iii) the complete address where the pit bull is primarily housed/sheltered; (iv) the<br />
telephone number of the pit bull’s owner and/or keeper; (v) the complete details of the pit<br />
bull’s documented identification, including but not limited to the pit bull’s registration<br />
and/or license number as issued by the Town; and (vi) a summary of the facts that the<br />
petitioner wishes to introduce for consideration in support of the petitioner’s appeal. The<br />
written petition shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.</p>
<p>(b) The hearing will be held before the hearing officer. Any facts which the petitioner<br />
wishes to be considered shall be submitted under oath or affirmation, either in writing or<br />
orally at the hearing. The hearing officer shall make a final determination of the<br />
petitioner’s appeal. Such final determination shall be considered a final action by a<br />
municipal board. If the dog is found to be a pit bull and the impoundment or the citation<br />
is in compliance with this by-law, the pit bull shall be destroyed unless the owner or<br />
keeper produces evidence deemed sufficient by the hearing officer that the pit bull is to<br />
be removed permanently from the Town and the owner or keeper pays the cost of<br />
impoundment. If the dog is found not to be a pit bull or the impoundment or citation is<br />
determined by the hearing officer not to have complied with this by-law, the dog shall be<br />
released to the owner or keeper with no impoundment fee imposed unless the dog was<br />
impounded as a result of the provisions of Section</p>
<p><strong>Submitted by Petition</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Board of Selectmen does not recommend approval by a vote of 4-0, one absent.<br />
The Finance Committee does not recommend approval by a vote of 5-0, one abstained, one<br />
absent.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paws4laws.com/local-ordinances/mashpee-ma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Rottweiler Club&#8217;s Formal Letter Of Opposition To Anti-Pet Bill NC SB 460</title>
		<link>http://paws4laws.com/official-arc-response/the-american-rottweiler-clubs-formal-letter-of-opposition-to-anti-pet-bill-nc-sb-460/</link>
		<comments>http://paws4laws.com/official-arc-response/the-american-rottweiler-clubs-formal-letter-of-opposition-to-anti-pet-bill-nc-sb-460/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Pet Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official ARC Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminalizes Dog Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Don Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to the cruel and inhumane treatment of dogs, the exploitation of innocent animals, and illegal, sub-standard breeding operations.

We therefore respectfully submit our official and unequivocal opposition to North Carolina SB 460 and to any other bill which makes criminals out of law-abiding, tax-paying citizens and home and hobby breeders, or anyone owning intact dogs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Rottweiler Club formally responds to North Carolina&#8217;s anti-pet bill SB 460, sponsored by Senator Don Davis.  The text of our letter is below.</p>
<p>July 7, 2009</p>
<p>The Honorable Don Davis</p>
<p>VIA FAX:  916-327-2188</p>
<p>North Carolina Senate<br />
300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 525<br />
Raleigh, NC 27603-5925</p>
<p><strong>RE: NORTH CAROLINA SB 460 &#8211; OPPOSED</strong></p>
<p>Dear Senator Davis:</p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club, Inc. (ARC), the parent club of the American Kennel Club (AKC) for the Rottweiler breed in the United States, representing thousands of dog owners, is writing to express our grave concern over North Carolina SB 460 &#8211; A Bill That Criminalizes Certain Dog Ownership</p>
<p>Since its inception, the American Rottweiler Club has been deeply engaged in advancing animal welfare and the humane care and treatment of dogs. ARC members and supporters devote significant time, effort and resources in educating the public on responsible dog ownership, and supporting to scores of animal rescue and sheltering organizations across the United States through direct donations, grants and volunteer support.</p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club is adamantly opposed to the cruel and inhumane treatment of dogs, the exploitation of innocent animals, and illegal, sub-standard breeding operations.</p>
<p>We therefore respectfully submit our official and unequivocal opposition to North Carolina SB 460 and to any other bill which makes criminals out of law-abiding, tax-paying citizens and home and hobby breeders, or anyone owning intact dogs.</p>
<p>North Carolina SB sets a dangerous precedent for the type and scope of legislation including</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>NC SB 460 makes criminals of responsible, tax-paying pet owners based on the reproductive status and/or numbers of pets</strong></li>
<li><strong>NC SB 460 will escalate costs for the state and municipalities already in financial crisi</strong></li>
<li><strong>NC SB 460 deprives dog-owning citizens of Due Process</strong></li>
<li><strong>NC SB 460 creates the possibility of warrantless searches and seizures</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>NC SB 460 – Criminalizing Dog Ownership &amp; Dog Breeding</strong></p>
<p>NC SB 460 seems to take aim at anyone engaged in the breeding of dogs, and makes criminals out of vast majority of breeders who are responsible, law-abiding and caring individuals or establishments, deeply dedicated to the welfare of dogs.</p>
<p>NC SB 460 imposes higher standards for dog breeding than any other animal including pets such as cats</p>
<p>Additionally, this bill requires a veterinarian’s certification for suitability to breed – such certification does not exist and opinions could be very diverse.  Accidental breedings could result in criminal penalties and revocation or failure to renew license.</p>
<p>This bill seems to stem from the misconception that owners of breeding stock, intact dogs, or multiple dogs are de-facto “puppy mills” – which is certainly not the case.</p>
<p>We respectfully point out that the term, “puppy mill” is highly inflammatory and deliberately misleading.</p>
<p>Most home and hobby breeders – as well as the vast majority of commercial kennels – operate under a set of standards set forth not just by the state, but by the very organizations to which we belong, concerning the care, treatment, feeding, and training of healthy dogs.</p>
<p>We would like to make very clear that any substandard and inhumane conditions at kennels – whether they be commercial operations or privately-owned home or hobby kennels – are still substandard and inhumane, and therefore subject to the strict enforcement of North Carolina&#8217;s anti-cruelty statutes.</p>
<p>Sadly, it is the lack of enforcement, and the lack of state or municipal funding for enforcement, combined with a lacking of understanding of basic animal husbandry, that often is to blame for allowing such conditions to exist.</p>
<p>We, therefore, recommend that strong enforcement of the State’s animal cruelty laws are the correct remedy to such filthy and cruel establishments, but that criminalizing the ownership and breeding of dogs – or criminalizing the ownership or breeding of any animals for that matter – is a misguided approach.</p>
<p>NC SB 460 – Fails To Improve Upon Existing Animal Cruelty  Statutes</p>
<p>NC SB 460 does nothing to improve the state’s current animal cruelty laws.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there ALREADY is existing law to deal with puppy mills:</p>
<p>•    Cruelty laws (The Wayne County operation has been indicted for 12 criminal counts)<br />
•    Animal Welfare Act currently regulates commercial breeders who have more than 5 litters annually<br />
•    Adds second duplicative level of licensing for the target audience – the large scale commercial breeder who is currently covered as a dog dealer</p>
<p><strong>NC SB 460 – Vague and Unacceptable</strong></p>
<p>NC SB 460 carries the requirement for annual veterinary certification of “suitable health” for breeding.  This vague and completely unacceptable.</p>
<p>Certification could require anything from routine physical exam to an expensive panel of blood tests and x-rays.</p>
<p>There are no standardized, specific laboratory tests or specialized reproductive examination procedures that are suitable for assessing the health status of bitches for breeding. No other species has this pre-breeding regulation in place.</p>
<p>This provision only serves to make breeding dogs more expensive and more complicated.</p>
<p>Finally, the decision to breed or not breed a dog should remain at the discretion of the owner and their veterinarian and not become a legislative mandate.</p>
<p><strong>NC SB 460  &#8211; Fiscally Irresponsible</strong></p>
<p>Implementation of NC SB 460 adds greatly to the current state budget deficit.</p>
<p>The State of North Carolina’s Fiscal Research Division shows in an analysis released on June 29, 2009, estimate the cost of annual licensing, inspections and enforcement will exceed $425,000 per year.</p>
<p>In addition, the Fiscal Note indicates previous kennel takeovers have cost more than $345,000 in additional costs for care of animals while in custody and the cost to Wayne County for assuming custody of seized dogs for less than a week was greater than $100,000</p>
<p>There will be no “windfall” of underpaid sales taxes to accrue to the State North Carolina exempts the sale of animals from sales tax.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>58-24 ANIMALS AND ANIMAL CAGES   Purchases of animals from a commercial animal breeder or producer by<br />
manufacturers, research laboratories, other businesses or individuals<br />
are exempt from tax.</em></p>
<p>Furthermore, there is also no “windfall” of under-reported income tax from dog breeders as puppy farmers already pay income taxes just like pig or turkey farmers and other citizens</p>
<p>It would be fiscally irresponsible for the members of the North Carolina Legislature to impose new costs while at the same time cutting other social programs, cuts which hurt the citizens of North Carolina.</p>
<p><strong>NC SB 460: Violations of the 14th Amendment &amp; Constitutionality Of Imposing Limits On Animal Ownership</strong></p>
<p>It is the contention of the American Rottweiler Club that the State would exceed its authority by attempting to regulate the ownership or possession of property – a violation of the 14th Amendment.</p>
<p>The Committee of course is fully aware that the 14th Amendment makes clear that:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</em></p>
<p>NC SB 460 violates the 14th Amendment by predicating animal ownership upon compliance with these arbitrary and revokeable licensing requirements:</p>
<p>§ 19A 29.2. reads</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>“Denial of access to the commercial breeding operation shall be grounds for revocation of the commercial breeders license.&#8221; The law should be very clear that only the kennel area can be inspected. Entry and search of private residence should not be included as a requirement of inspection and licensure; to do so would be considered a warrantless search and invasion of privacy.</em></p>
<p>In addition, § 19A 30. (3a) reads that a license can be revoked for failure to comply with the statutes and rules governing commercial breeding operations. This would include infractions of required paperwork and record-keeping. License revocation is far too severe a penalty for such mistakes.</p>
<p>Does the State of North Carolina intend to limit the ownership of property by making it “revokeable”?</p>
<p>We, therefore, ask if it is the intent of this Committee to see that the rights of tax-paying, law-abiding and dog-owning citizens in North Carolina be abridged, and is it the intent of NC SB 460 to deprive such citizens not only of Due Process but Equal Protection as well?</p>
<p><strong>NC SB 460: Possible Warrantless Search &amp; Seizure</strong></p>
<p>It should be noted that NC SB 460 contains provisions making warrantless searches and seizures likely, seriously compromising the constitutional protections to which all citizens are entitled under the guise of animal protection.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>• Allows Inspections of private property at any time. The bill allows law enforcement and local animal control to search the private property at any time of day or night of anyone who falls under the definition of “commercial breeder”.</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><br />
• Allowance for seizure of animals for those who do not comply with the new regulations, with no opportunity to come into compliance. If a commercial breeder is unlicensed, animals will be subject to immediate seizure and impoundment and may be sold or euthanized with no opportunity to come into compliance with the law.</strong></p>
<p>We respectfully ask the Committee Members just what would constitute “probable cause” under NC SB 460 – is it the appointed, authorized representative&#8217;s word that pets “may” be intact?</p>
<p><strong>NC SB 480 &#8211; Civil Rights &amp; Constitutional Issues</strong></p>
<p>NC SB 460 presents a multitude of civil rights issues and constitution challenges, including but not limited to unequal protection, violation of due process, removal of the presumption of innocence, selective enforcement, interference with lawful activities and loss of personal rights.</p>
<p>NC SB 460 also sets the stage for unequal protection in that owners of subjectively targeted breeds or intact dogs of breeding stock are thus arbitrarily and subjectively held to a different and higher legal standard than other dog-owning citizens, for which the State Of North Carolina has not proven nor cannot prove a rational or legal basis.</p>
<p><strong>Closing Thoughts</strong></p>
<p>In closing, the American Rottweiler Club rejects the potential criminalization of responsible dog ownership, the flawed concept of outlawing or eliminating through heavy-handed regulation the lawful breeding, ownership, and custody of dogs – or ANY animals.</p>
<p>We formally oppose the erosion of the rights and liberties guaranteed to all citizens of the United States under the guise of animal protection.</p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club, having conducted a thorough analysis of this bill, concludes that North Carolina SB 460 would:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>May criminalize dog ownership</strong></li>
<li><strong>Fails to protect the welfare of ALL dogs</strong></li>
<li><strong> Deprives citizens of Due Process</strong></li>
<li><strong>Wastes valuable tax-payer dollars</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>NC SB 460:  In Summary</strong></p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club urges the members of the General Assembly of the State Of North Carolina to act appropriately and responsibly by voting NO on North Carolina SB 460.</p>
<p>We urge the Committee Members to reject NC SB 460 in its entirety, and not allow this misguided piece of legislation, no matter how well-intentioned, to bring about the destruction of innocent dogs, eliminate the responsible and ethical ownership of dogs, discriminate against owners of intact dogs, and deprive people of their rights.</p>
<p>We thank you for your attention to this very important matter and remain committed to providing the State of North Carolina with expert advice in matters of animal husbandry and the humane care and treatment of dogs.  We would be honored to be called upon to serve.</p>
<p>Very truly yours,</p>
<p>Jeff Shaver<br />
President<br />
American Rottweiler Club, Inc.<br />
jshaver522@yahoo.com<br />
web site) www.AmRottClub.org</p>
<p>cc: American Rottweiler Club Board, Peter Piusz, Delegate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paws4laws.com/official-arc-response/the-american-rottweiler-clubs-formal-letter-of-opposition-to-anti-pet-bill-nc-sb-460/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina SB 460 &#8211; Anti-Pet Bill Criminalizes Dog Ownership</title>
		<link>http://paws4laws.com/state-bills/north-carolina-sb-460-anti-pet-bill-criminalizes-dog-ownership/</link>
		<comments>http://paws4laws.com/state-bills/north-carolina-sb-460-anti-pet-bill-criminalizes-dog-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin23</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Pet Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminalizes Dog Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Berger; Stan Bingham; Daniel G. Clodfelter; Charlie S. Dannelly; Katie G. Dorsett; Don East; Tony Foriest; Linda Garrou; Steve Goss; Malcolm Graham; Fletcher L. Hartsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.; David W. Hoyle; Neal Hunt; Clark Jenkins; Ed Jones; Eleanor Kinnaird; Vernon Malone; Floyd B. McKissick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.; Josh Stein; Richard Stevens; Don Vaughan; David F. Weinstein.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.; Larry Shaw; R. C. Soles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.; Martin L. Nesbitt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Carolina Senate Bill 460 is an anti-pet bill sponsored by freshman Senator Don Davis and supported by North Carolina Senators Tom Apodaca (Buncombe), Julia Boseman (New Hanover), Daniel Clodfelter (Mecklenburg),  Charlie Dannelly (Mecklenburg), Linda Garrou (Forsyth), David Hoyle (Gaston),  Neal Hunt (Wake), Clark Jenkins (Edgecombe), Ellie Kinnaird (Orange), Martin Nesbitt (Buncombe), Tony Rand (Cumberland), Bob Rucho (Mecklenburg), RC Soles (Brunswick), Josh Stein (Wake).

The American Rottweiler Club urges members and pet owners alike to contact North Carolina State elected representatives to immediately oppose this bill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Carolina Senate Bill 460 is an anti-pet bill sponsored by Sen. Don Davis and co-sponsored by  	Austin M. Allran;</p>
<div id="attachment_401" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 196px"><a href="http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/nc-senator-don-davis-anti-pet-bill-sponsor-nc-sb-460.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-401" title="nc-senator-don-davis-anti-pet-bill-sponsor-nc-sb-460" src="http://legislation.americanrottweilerclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/nc-senator-don-davis-anti-pet-bill-sponsor-nc-sb-460.jpg" alt="NC SB 460 Sponsor, Don Davis" width="186" height="260" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">NC SB 460 Sponsor, Don Davis</p></div>
<p>Doug Berger;  Stan Bingham;  Daniel G. Clodfelter;  Charlie S. Dannelly;  Katie G. Dorsett;  Don East;  Tony Foriest;  Linda Garrou;  Steve Goss;  Malcolm Graham;  Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr.;  David W. Hoyle;  Neal Hunt;  Clark Jenkins;  Ed Jones;  Eleanor Kinnaird;  Vernon Malone;  Floyd B. McKissick, Jr.;  Martin L. Nesbitt, Jr.;  Larry Shaw;  R. C. Soles, Jr.;  Josh Stein;  Richard Stevens;  Don Vaughan;  David F. Weinstein.</p>
<p>NC SB 460 is also supported by North Carolina Senators Tom Apodaca (Buncombe), Julia Boseman (New Hanover), Daniel Clodfelter (Mecklenburg),  Charlie Dannelly (Mecklenburg), Linda Garrou (Forsyth), David Hoyle (Gaston),  Neal Hunt (Wake), Clark Jenkins (Edgecombe), Ellie Kinnaird (Orange), Martin Nesbitt (Buncombe), Tony Rand (Cumberland), Bob Rucho (Mecklenburg), RC Soles (Brunswick), Josh Stein (Wake).</p>
<p>The American Rottweiler Club urges members and pet owners alike to contact North Carolina State elected representatives to immediately oppose this bill.</p>
<p>The language of NC SB 460 is below:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA<br />
SESSION 2009<br />
S 1<br />
SENATE BILL 460*<br />
Short Title: Commercial Dog Breeders. (Public)</p>
<p>Sponsors: Senators Davis, Vaughan; Allran, Berger of Franklin, Bingham, Clodfelter,<br />
Dannelly, Dorsett, East, Foriest, Garrou, Goss, Graham, Hartsell, Hoyle, Hunt,<br />
Jenkins, Jones, Kinnaird, Malone, McKissick, Nesbitt, Shaw, Soles, Stein,<br />
Stevens, and Weinstein.<br />
Referred to: Commerce.</p>
<p>March 9, 2009<br />
*S460-v-1*<br />
1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED<br />
2 AN ACT TO REGULATE THE COMMERCIAL BREEDING OF DOGS.<br />
3 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:<br />
4 SECTION 1. G.S. 19A-21 reads as rewritten:<br />
5 &#8220;§ 19A-21. Purposes.<br />
6 The purposes of this Article are (i) to protect the owners of dogs and cats from the theft of<br />
7 such pets; (ii) to prevent the sale or use of stolen pets; (iii) to insure that animals, as items of<br />
8 commerce, are provided humane care and treatment by regulating the transportation,<br />
9 commercial breeding, sale, purchase, housing, care, handling and treatment of such animals by<br />
10 persons or organizations engaged in transporting, breeding, buying, or selling them for such<br />
11 use; (iv) to insure that animals confined in commercial breeding operations, pet shops, kennels,<br />
12 animal shelters and auction markets are provided humane care and treatment; (v) to prohibit the<br />
13 sale, trade or adoption of those animals which show physical signs of infection, communicable<br />
14 disease, or congenital abnormalities, unless veterinary care is assured subsequent to sale, trade<br />
15 or adoption.&#8221;<br />
16 SECTION 2. G.S. 19A-23 reads as rewritten:<br />
17 &#8220;§ 19A-23. Definitions.<br />
18 For the purposes of this Article, the following terms, when used in the Article or the rules<br />
19 or orders made pursuant thereto, shall be construed respectively to mean:<br />
20 …<br />
21 (5b) &#8220;Commercial breeder&#8221; means any person who, during any 12-month period,<br />
22 maintains 15 or more adult female dogs for the primary purpose of the sale<br />
23 of their offspring as companion animals.<br />
24 (5c) &#8220;Commercial breeding operation&#8221; means the physical location or facility at<br />
25 which a commercial breeder breeds or maintains adult female dogs and their<br />
26 offspring.&#8221;<br />
27 SECTION 3. G.S. 19A-24(a) reads as rewritten:<br />
28 &#8220;(a) The Board of Agriculture shall:<br />
29 (1) Establish standards for the care of animals at animal shelters, boarding<br />
30 kennels, pet shops, and public auctions. A boarding kennel that offers dog<br />
31 day care services and has a ratio of dogs to employees or supervisors, or<br />
32 both employees and supervisors, of not more than 10 to one, shall not as to<br />
33 such services be subject to any regulations that restrict the number of dogs<br />
34 that are permitted within any primary enclosure.<br />
General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2009<br />
Page 2 Senate Bill 460*-First Edition<br />
1 (1a) Establish standards for the care of animals at commercial breeding<br />
2 operations. The standards adopted shall include provisions for adequate daily<br />
3 exercise, adequate veterinary care, appropriate housing for adult females,<br />
4 females with litters and weaned puppies, and record keeping.<br />
5 (2) Prescribe the manner in which animals may be transported to and from<br />
6 registered or licensed premises.<br />
7 (3) Require licensees and holders of certificates to keep records of the purchase<br />
8 and sale of animals and to identify animals at their establishments.<br />
9 (4) Adopt rules to implement this Article, including federal regulations<br />
10 promulgated under Title 7, Chapter 54, of the United States Code.<br />
11 (5) Adopt rules on the euthanasia of animals in the possession or custody of any<br />
12 person required to obtain a certificate of registration under this Article. An<br />
13 animal shall only be put to death by a method and delivery of method<br />
14 approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association, the Humane<br />
15 Society of the United States, or the American Humane Association. The<br />
16 Department shall establish rules for the euthanasia process using any one or<br />
17 combination of methods and standards prescribed by the three<br />
18 aforementioned organizations. The rules shall address the equipment, the<br />
19 process, and the separation of animals, in addition to the animals&#8217; age and<br />
20 condition. If the gas method of euthanasia is approved, rules shall require (i)<br />
21 that only commercially compressed carbon monoxide gas is approved for<br />
22 use, and (ii) that the gas must be delivered in a commercially manufactured<br />
23 chamber that allows for the individual separation of animals. Rules shall also<br />
24 mandate training for any person who participates in the euthanasia process.&#8221;<br />
25 SECTION 4. G.S. 19A-30 reads as rewritten:<br />
26 &#8220;§ 19A-30. Refusal, suspension or revocation of certificate or license.<br />
27 The Director may refuse to issue or renew or may suspend or revoke a certificate of<br />
28 registration for any animal shelter or a license for any commercial breeder, public auction,<br />
29 kennel, pet shop, or dealer, if after an impartial investigation as provided in this Article he<br />
30 determines that any one or more of the following grounds apply:<br />
31 (1) Material misstatement in the application for the original certificate of<br />
32 registration or license or in the application for any renewal under this<br />
33 Article;<br />
34 (2) Willful disregard or violation of this Article or any rules issued pursuant<br />
35 thereto;<br />
36 (3) Failure to provide adequate housing facilities and/or primary enclosures for<br />
37 the purposes of this Article, or if the feeding, watering, sanitizing and<br />
38 housing practices at the animal shelter, public auction, pet shop, or kennel<br />
39 are not consistent with the intent of this Article or the rules adopted under<br />
40 this Article;<br />
41 (3a) Failure to comply with the statutes and rules governing commercial breeding<br />
42 operations.<br />
43 (4) Allowing one&#8217;s license under this Article to be used by an unlicensed person;<br />
44 (5) Conviction of any crime an essential element of which is misstatement,<br />
45 fraud, or dishonesty, or conviction of any felony;<br />
46 (6) Making substantial misrepresentations or false promises of a character likely<br />
47 to influence, persuade, or induce in connection with the business of a public<br />
48 auction, commercial kennel, commercial breeding operation, pet shop, or<br />
49 dealer;<br />
General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2009<br />
Senate Bill 460*-First Edition Page 3<br />
1 (7) Pursuing a continued course of misrepresentation of or making false<br />
2 promises through advertising, salesmen, agents, or otherwise in connection<br />
3 with the business to be licensed;<br />
4 (8) Failure to possess the necessary qualifications or to meet the requirements of<br />
5 this Article for the issuance or holding of a certificate of registration or<br />
6 license.<br />
7 The Director shall, before refusing to issue or renew and before suspension or revocation<br />
8 of a certificate of registration or a license, give to the applicant or holder thereof a written<br />
9 notice containing a statement indicating in what respects the applicant or holder has failed to<br />
10 satisfy the requirements for the holding of a certificate of registration or a license. If a<br />
11 certificate of registration or a license is suspended or revoked under the provisions hereof, the<br />
12 holder shall have five days from such suspension or revocation to surrender all certificates of<br />
13 registration or licenses issued thereunder to the Director or his authorized representative.<br />
14 A person to whom a certificate of registration or a license is denied, suspended, or revoked<br />
15 by the Director may contest the action by filing a petition under G.S. 150B-23 within five days<br />
16 after the denial, suspension, or revocation.<br />
17 Any licensee whose license is revoked under the provisions of this Article shall not be<br />
18 eligible to apply for a new license hereunder until one year has elapsed from the date of the<br />
19 order revoking said license or if an appeal is taken from said order of revocation, one year from<br />
20 the date of the order or final judgment sustaining said revocation. Any person who has been an<br />
21 officer, agent, or employee of a licensee whose license has been revoked or suspended and who<br />
22 is responsible for or participated in the violation upon which the order of suspension or<br />
23 revocation was based, shall not be licensed within the period during which the order of<br />
24 suspension or revocation is in effect.&#8221;<br />
25 SECTION 5. Article 1A of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes is amended by<br />
26 adding a new section to read:<br />
27 &#8220;§ 19A-29.1. License required for commercial breeder; penalty.<br />
28 (a) No commercial breeder shall operate in the State without first obtaining a<br />
29 commercial breeders license. Application for a license shall be in the manner provided by the<br />
30 Director. The license period shall be the fiscal year and the license fee shall be fifty dollars<br />
31 ($50.00) for each license period or part thereof, beginning with the first day of the fiscal year.<br />
32 (b) Failure of a commercial breeder to obtain a license as set forth in subsection (a) of<br />
33 this section shall constitute a Class 2 misdemeanor. Continued illegal operation after conviction<br />
34 shall constitute a separate offense. Animals found in the possession or custody of an unlicensed<br />
35 commercial breeder shall be subject to immediate seizure and impoundment and upon<br />
36 conviction of the unlicensed commercial breeder, shall become subject to sale or euthanasia in<br />
37 the discretion of the Director.&#8221;<br />
38 SECTION 6. Article 1A of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes is amended by<br />
39 adding a new section to read:<br />
40 &#8220;§ 19A-29.2. Additional standards of care for commercial breeders; inspections.<br />
41 (a) Commercial breeders shall not breed female dogs less than 18 months or more than<br />
42 eight years of age and shall provide adequate veterinary care to the female adult dogs and their<br />
43 offspring. An adult female dog shall not be bred without an annual certification from a licensed<br />
44 veterinarian that the dog is in suitable health for breeding.<br />
45 (b) Commercial breeding operations shall be subject to inspection by duly appointed<br />
46 employees of the Department or by local animal control officers. In conducting such<br />
47 inspections, the Department employee or local animal control officer may inspect the records of<br />
48 the commercial breeder, the premises where animals are bred and maintained, and any animal<br />
49 used in the breeding program or their offspring. Denial of access to the commercial breeding<br />
50 operation shall be grounds for revocation of the commercial breeders license.&#8221;<br />
General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2009<br />
Page 4 Senate Bill 460*-First Edition<br />
1 SECTION 7. Article 1A of Chapter 19A of the General Statutes is amended by<br />
2 adding a new section to read:<br />
3 &#8220;§ 19A-29.3. Penalties for commercial breeder failing to provide adequate care for<br />
4 animals; disposition of animals.<br />
5 The failure of a commercial breeder to adequately house, exercise, feed, water, provide<br />
6 adequate veterinary care, or otherwise meet the standards of care for the animals in the<br />
7 commercial breeder&#8217;s custody or possession shall constitute a Class 3 misdemeanor, and the<br />
8 commercial breeder shall be subject to a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) per animal<br />
9 or more than a total of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). The animals in the possession or<br />
10 custody of the commercial breeder shall be subject to seizure and impoundment and upon<br />
11 conviction may be sold or euthanized at the discretion of the Director, and the failure shall also<br />
12 constitute grounds for revocation of the commercial breeder&#8217;s license.&#8221;<br />
13 SECTION 8. This act becomes effective December 1, 2009, and applies to the<br />
14 commercial breeding of dogs on or after that date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paws4laws.com/state-bills/north-carolina-sb-460-anti-pet-bill-criminalizes-dog-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

